home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- On 20 Mar 1996, Odd H. Sandvik wrote:
-
- > Fabio Bizzetti (bizzetti@mbox.vol.it) wrote:
- >
- > : (PowerPC: btw, I bought a book and studied it, and I'm very
- > : disappointed IT SUCKS, all the other RISCs are better,
- > : starting from the old and cheap Transputers) and a different OS.
- >
- > Could you please explain why you think the PPC sucks ? Have you
- > bought books about all the other RISC's too ?
-
- I think the PPC is by all means an improvement, but AT might have taken a
- bit of a risk and made a better choice instead. I would have loved to
- have seen Sparc modules supported. If they'd just face reality, they'd
- see that the Amiga will not EVER compete with PC's or Macs on the same
- markets... it always had its own niche, BECAUSE it was different and
- because that created excitement and loyalty amongst the users. It was
- Amiga users who sold most of the new machines... not Commodore's
- marketing. However, there's been nothing new to carry that excitement for
- years, so things are dying, if they aren't dead already. So far, AT have
- done absolutely NOTHING for the loyal followers. All they seem intent on
- doing is following the crowd, making some token gestures towards unifying
- the Amiga userbase with the more common platforms, and producing tacky,
- gimmicky hardware that isn't an upgrade for 50% of users. Seriously, the
- Walker is a joke, when you can buy a second hand system (or keep your
- existing one) with higher specs for the same or less money. Where are the
- OS improvements? Where are the incentives for existing users of
- higher-spec Amigas? Oh yes, wait an indefinite period, then pay a huge
- premium for PPC cards... and follow the crowd... well, you could, if the
- OS was improved to the standard that a lot of other platforms enjoy.
-
- > : It seems that AT said << *everything* must be done with the OS,
- > : If AT wants this shit from PowerAmiga, then IMHO the *last*
- > : Amiga will be the 680x0 and AGA based ones. The PowerAmiga
- > : will be a PC with just another CPU.
- >
- > No, It will run AmigaOS. Don't you see that the OS is the ONLY
- > advantage the Amiga has today! It lacks in all other
- > departments!
-
- Heh, are you implying that the OS isn't lacking? How about these:
-
- * Virtual Memory.
- * Memory Protection.
- * Resource Tracking.
- * A decent file system.
- * An attractive, consistent GUI.
- * A good API and strong developers tools.
- * Device independance.
-
- Last but not least, where are our developers and publishing houses?
-
- > : The A1000/A500 and A2000 were dream computers IMO because of
- > : their custom chips and architecture, not because of the lame
- > : 1.0/1.1/1.2 OS.
- >
- > Yeah, right... Maybe in 1985. Today the custom chips is the
- > weakest part of the Amiga architecture.
-
- I would actually say that at this point, the weakest part of the Amiga
- platform is its manufacturer. The OS and the hardware run an equal
- second.
-
- > What other _viable_ and _affordable_ CPU would YOU choose for
- > the Amiga ?
-
- HP-PA, Sparc, Alpha, in fact, name your processor... if only AT would cut
- the AmigaOS losses, move a long way to portable source (instead of taking
- the cheap-shot option with 68k emulation on the PPC).
-
- > : Well,from the deepest of my heart: FUCK OFF AT,
- > : you made it all become useless.
- >
- > Sure. This is just the constructive feedback AT needs. NOT!
-
- Essentially, AT is giving the existing users that very message. They're
- alienating existing users in order to sell to supposed new markets. Well,
- here's where my unwavering support ends I'm afraid. I'll keep my existing
- system as my favourite old companion and novelty, and I'm moving on to a
- Sparcstation, and a portable Mac. That way I can actually get things
- done, and still play with my Amiga, writing a program here and there. I
- sincerely hope that AT finds a new market, and I regret that the direction
- that they're following no longer suits my needs.
-
- The amount of support that AT is getting from the users which it primarily
- intends to make money from is ridiculous, I've never seen anything like
- it. Most companies actually need to give something back to the users to
- keep them loyal and ready to spend.
-
- Peter Naylor
-
-